1/16 Hole in the intake manifold under the carby

Commercial talk! email JCC UK Registrar. Technical Question? Try Service Bulletins or TechLibrary first. Note that you need to be a club member to view the Tech Library.
Post Reply
Bradford Society Trust
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:22 am
Location: Sydney Australia

1/16 Hole in the intake manifold under the carby

Post by Bradford Society Trust »

has anyone information on what the 1/16 hole in the intake manifold under the carby is there for[/list]
Keith Andrews
Posts: 941
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:11 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by Keith Andrews »

Thats what I was told, but I cant see that being the reason
Access fuel will not logically pool there.
A flooded engine can be easly clearded by pumping thru the engine with WOT and held there
I have never managed to flood my Bradford.
In effect it is a manifold 'leak'
I cant see any reason for it, and have blocked off to see any effect, and didnt notice any, other than having to change idle circuit mixture.
My Spelling is Not Incorrect...It's 'Creative'
george garside
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: formby , merseyside

Post by george garside »

not absolutely certain or perhaps not even a bit sure about this one but from what I can recolect the said orifice was definately put there for a purpose which I think could have been tied up with the need for the 'horn' on top of the carb to prevent flames shooting up in the event of a bad blow back. That bit is correct & was given to me by the lateHorace Grimley. now to the uncertain bit! the orifice may have been tied up with what Jowetts considered to be a real risk of conflagration by providing a drain to prevent accumulation of ignitable unburnt fuel in the induction pipe immediately below the carb.
Any other ideas around - unless anybody can come up with a better theory I would advise that the orifice be left as intended!
george
george garside
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: formby , merseyside

Post by george garside »

not absolutely certain or perhaps not even a bit sure about this one but from what I can recolect the said orifice was definately put there for a purpose which I think could have been tied up with the need for the 'horn' on top of the carb to prevent flames shooting up in the event of a bad blow back. That bit is correct & was given to me by the lateHorace Grimley. now to the uncertain bit! the orifice may have been tied up with what Jowetts considered to be a real risk of conflagration by providing a drain to prevent accumulation of ignitable unburnt fuel in the induction pipe immediately below the carb.
Any other ideas around - unless anybody can come up with a better theory I would advise that the orifice be left as intended!
george
george garside
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: formby , merseyside

Post by george garside »

not absolutely certain or perhaps not even a bit sure about this one but from what I can recolect the said orifice was definately put there for a purpose which I think could have been tied up with the need for the 'horn' on top of the carb to prevent flames shooting up in the event of a bad blow back. That bit is correct & was given to me by the lateHorace Grimley. now to the uncertain bit! the orifice may have been tied up with what Jowetts considered to be a real risk of conflagration by providing a drain to prevent accumulation of ignitable unburnt fuel in the induction pipe immediately below the carb.
Any other ideas around - unless anybody can come up with a better theory I would advise that the orifice be left as intended!
george
george garside
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: formby , merseyside

Post by george garside »

not absolutely certain or perhaps not even a bit sure about this one but from what I can recolect the said orifice was definately put there for a purpose which I think could have been tied up with the need for the 'horn' on top of the carb to prevent flames shooting up in the event of a bad blow back. That bit is correct & was given to me by the lateHorace Grimley. now to the uncertain bit! the orifice may have been tied up with what Jowetts considered to be a real risk of conflagration by providing a drain to prevent accumulation of ignitable unburnt fuel in the induction pipe immediately below the carb.
Any other ideas around - unless anybody can come up with a better theory I would advise that the orifice be left as intended!
george
george garside
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: formby , merseyside

Post by george garside »

not absolutely certain or perhaps not even a bit sure about this one but from what I can recolect the said orifice was definately put there for a purpose which I think could have been tied up with the need for the 'horn' on top of the carb to prevent flames shooting up in the event of a bad blow back. That bit is correct & was given to me by the lateHorace Grimley. now to the uncertain bit! the orifice may have been tied up with what Jowetts considered to be a real risk of conflagration by providing a drain to prevent accumulation of ignitable unburnt fuel in the induction pipe immediately below the carb.
Any other ideas around - unless anybody can come up with a better theory I would advise that the orifice be left as intended!
george
george garside
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:47 pm
Location: formby , merseyside

Post by george garside »

sorry for the multiplicity of identical postings - must have haad fidgety finger on mouse
g
Post Reply

Return to “Bradford”