Gearbox mounting fracture.

Comfortable talk! email JCC UK Registrar. Technical Question? Try Service Bulletins or TechNotes or Tech Library or Parts book first. Note that you need to be a club member to view the Tech Library..

Paul Wilks' Javelin was shortlisted for Classic Car of the Year 2013.
Post Reply
Forumadmin
Site Admin
Posts: 20648
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:18 pm
Your interest in the forum: Not a lot!
Given Name: Forum

Gearbox mounting fracture.

Post by Forumadmin »

Chris reported a vibration on the Javelin last year so I investigated with the car on the lift.
I found this.
Image
Image
Image
The old perished rubber was removed.
The sheared mounting was welded up in situ. Extra weld was put on to strengthen.
Two of the layrub bolts were loosened to allow some axial movement. The new rubber was inserted by using a little persuasion with a scissor jack to move the gearbox forward. The rubber ring was cut and I do not think this will have any detrimental effect. I thought about gluing it back together but did not.
Image
Image
The wood on another jack to lift the gearbox for chassis bolt alignment.
The engine was prized back axially to allow fitting of the 4 plate fixing bolts.
Two extra washers were put between each of the four bolts holding the rubber holding plates together.The washers were held with some masking tape on a screwdriver to aid insertion.The mounting was checked for ability to rotate.
RandalColman
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:40 am
Your interest in the forum: I have owned a 1951 Javelin since 1990. My particular interest is DIY/cheapo restoration. I also have two 1980s Hondas, which may not qualify as classic cars, but they appeal to me more than the Jowett.

Re: Gearbox mounting fracture.

Post by RandalColman »

Good photos, Keith. I have seen a few of these brackets either cracked or repaired, so I hung onto some spare ones I was given. It seems that Jowett increased the thickness at some point, but only from about 2.4mm to 2.8mm. They may have found it difficult to press anything thicker into the conical shape. I don't know if it is conventional to stress-relieve parts that small, but it is clear that the residual stresses from the pressing and welding would have made it susceptible to fatigue.

If the washers you mention are sandwiched between the cupped plates holding the rubber rings then, as you are probably aware, softening the rear mount can lead to clutch shudder. I think there was something in the service bulletins about that. The whole engine is pulled backwards when you press the clutch, so if it is free to jiggle back and forth there is a feedback effect on the clutch engagement.
Last edited by RandalColman on Sat May 17, 2014 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Keith Clements
websitedesign
Posts: 3968
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:22 am
Your interest in the forum: Jup NKD 258, the most widely travelled , raced and rallied Jowett.
Given Name: Keith
Contact:

Re: Gearbox mounting fracture.

Post by Keith Clements »

You add washers to make sure the mounting is just free to turn on the gearbox output housing. If it does not turn then you are likely to crack the clutch housing. It is possible that the rubbers rust solid, so a periodic check is advisable. There should be no axial movement.
In my case the rubber had become fluid and oused out, so was due for replacement anyway. This did give some axial movement and some clutch judder which may have hastened the mounting failure .

I also went around many nuts and tightened them. The oil leak you see hopefully is now cured. The nuts holding the output tube took half a turn each! Perhaps I am getting stronger in my old age. Worth doing a 'spanner check' whenever you have chance. Something I learnt off John Blanckley when rallying with him. Although in these days of thread lock it is less necessary.
skype = keithaclements ;
Post Reply

Return to “Javelin”