From the website statistics

noggin not available yet!

Come to a Technical Meeting and not only natter but get your Jowett going better.
Jowett Technical Weekend
Post Reply
Keith Clements
websitedesign
Posts: 3820
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:22 am
Your interest in the forum: Jup NKD 258, the most widely travelled , raced and rallied Jowett.
Given Name: Keith
Contact:

From the website statistics

Post by Keith Clements »

Just thought I would check the website logs and found this...

Why was this link accessed so frequently yesterday?
http://jowett.org/jowettnet/images/2004 ... 20141.html
The late Duncan Laing's car.
skype = keithaclements ;
Keith Clements
websitedesign
Posts: 3820
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:22 am
Your interest in the forum: Jup NKD 258, the most widely travelled , raced and rallied Jowett.
Given Name: Keith
Contact:

Referrers

Post by Keith Clements »

Just thought you might like to see who linked to Jowett.org yesterday. I have taken out the dozen dodgy ones!

telegraph.co.uk/motoring/c... with 3 referrals
bing.com/search?q=jowett&F... with 1 referrals
Last edited by Keith Clements on Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:51 pm, edited 5 times in total.
skype = keithaclements ;
Keith Clements
websitedesign
Posts: 3820
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:22 am
Your interest in the forum: Jup NKD 258, the most widely travelled , raced and rallied Jowett.
Given Name: Keith
Contact:

From a month of website statistics

Post by Keith Clements »

This includes sessions from search engines.
Once again it shows that not all browsing is likely to be beneficial! Forensic investigation of who is doing it is certainly interesting. :lol:

Statistical Report for: jowett.org NOTE This does not include jowett.net, the Forum and the Gallery.

Session Analysis: Report for Date Range
Information Description

Start: 21 October 2012
End: 20 November 2012
Units: Sessions Sessions Analysis shows an overview of the origins of recorded sessions over the selected time range.


Breakdown of Traffic by Continent

North America with 4283 sessions (29.8% of all sessions)
Asia with 3494 sessions (24.3% of all sessions)
[N/A] with 3129 sessions (21.8% of all sessions)
Europe with 3089 sessions (21.5% of all sessions)
Australia and Oceania with 214 sessions (1.5% of all sessions)
South America with 25 sessions (0.2% of all sessions)
Africa with 20 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)


Breakdown of Traffic from the Continent of Asia

China with 2836 sessions (19.7% of all sessions)
Russia with 472 sessions (3.3% of all sessions)
Japan with 79 sessions (0.5% of all sessions)
South Korea with 33 sessions (0.2% of all sessions)
Hong Kong with 13 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)
India with 10 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)
Israel with 7 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Pakistan with 5 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Vietnam with 5 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Philippines with 5 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Indonesia with 5 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Azerbaijan with 5 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Iran with 4 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Thailand with 3 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Malaysia with 3 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Mongolia with 2 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Saudi Arabia with 2 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Singapore with 2 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
United Arab Emirates with 1 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Sri Lanka with 1 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Taiwan with 1 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)


Breakdown of Traffic from the Continent of Europe

Great Britain with 1577 sessions (11.0% of all sessions)
Bulgaria with 441 sessions (3.1% of all sessions)
Ukraine with 434 sessions (3.0% of all sessions)
Germany with 160 sessions (1.1% of all sessions)
Sweden with 132 sessions (0.9% of all sessions)
France with 86 sessions (0.6% of all sessions)
Netherlands with 42 sessions (0.3% of all sessions)
Switzerland with 31 sessions (0.2% of all sessions)
Poland with 26 sessions (0.2% of all sessions)
Portugal with 21 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)
Belgium with 20 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)
Spain with 19 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)
Denmark with 18 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)
Italy with 16 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)
Turkey with 16 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)
Norway with 12 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)
Finland with 7 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Czech Republic with 6 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Ireland with 5 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Cyprus with 4 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Austria with 2 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Hungary with 2 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Malta with 2 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Lithuania with 2 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Macedonia (Former Yugosla with 1 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)


Breakdown of Traffic from the Continent of North America

United States with 4244 sessions (29.5% of all sessions)
Canada with 38 sessions (0.3% of all sessions)
Barbados with 1 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)


Breakdown of Traffic from the Continent of South America

Uruguay with 25 sessions (0.2% of all sessions)


Breakdown of Traffic from the Continent of Australia and Oceana

Australia with 145 sessions (1.0% of all sessions)
New Zealand with 69 sessions (0.5% of all sessions)


Breakdown of Traffic from the Continent of Antarctica

No data for selected period


Breakdown of Traffic from the Continent of Africa

Mauritius with 18 sessions (0.1% of all sessions)
Algeria with 1 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Seychelles with 1 sessions (0.0% of all sessions)
Last edited by Keith Clements on Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
skype = keithaclements ;
Jack
Posts: 1113
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:49 am
Location: Herts
Contact:

Re: From the website statistics

Post by Jack »

As some of those sites are almost certainly malicious ones containing spyware, I would advise breaking the links so that idle mice do not click on them in a quiet moment...

Also by posting return links from here to there, you achieve their purpose - boosted Google rankings and some kind of credibility from us as a referring site.

Jack.
Keith Andrews
Posts: 941
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:11 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: From the website statistics

Post by Keith Andrews »

Althu most servers use built in programs like Awstats....the statstical information provided by theses programs is hugely misleading to say the least....they do not provide enough informationto edit security as in .htaccess (if apachie)... thu they do tend to make the hosting customers poke their chests out in ignorant pride.

If u have access to the raw log files, u can ID the url s each is hitting..
ie these and similar

Code: Select all

=http/
 /modules.php?name=your_account&rediredt=
/xmlrpc.php
you can then crossreverence each of those IPs against a spam, email bots and malicuois intention data bases
Take off Search engine Bots , like google , bing, yahoo etc
What is left is still a blotted representation of actual useful stats....

Then if do have access to the raw log files... at an administration level well above the clients allowable permissions, even if manage to edit .htaccess file, the log will still show 30x redirects and 40x errors.
The server can be configured...at higher admin levers than clients have permission to......to have a "error.log" for the 30x and 40x errors and not appear in the access.log file.... which if able to get to raw logs would also be accessable if required.

After a decade of administratiing apachie servers at top level, accessing raw logs (which get quickly up into the 500 meg / 1.5 gig size for each web site/mail server) with regular security (usually daily) maintance, I can say with some authorty can be elimatinate 99.9% Asia, middle east.. in partiular Isrial (and far less the rest of the middle east), Brasil, Turkey, eastern Europe, Asia, (except Hong kong) ,
the USA, France, Germany, Sweden , Norway Canada, Spain , potugal, Sth And Central America and carabian.....remove around 90 to 95% .. note after removing Google/ bing/ yahoo search engine ips ranges.
The UK in the last 4 to 6 weeks has had a sudden increase from near nil top around 25/30%.
Oceanana less than 1%
My Spelling is Not Incorrect...It's 'Creative'
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests